WER has been developed and is used to check a speech recognition's engine accuracy. It works by calculating the distance between the engine's reults - called the hypothesis - and the real text - called the reference.
The distance function is based on the Levenshtein Distance (for finding the edit distance between words). The WER, like the Levenshtein distance, defines the distance by the amount of minimum operations that has to been done for getting from the reference to the hypothesis. Unlike the Levenshtein distance, however, the operations are on words and not on individual characters. The possible operations are:
Deletion: A word was deleted. A word was deleted from the reference.
Insertion: A word was added. An aligned word from the hypothesis was added.
Substitution: A word was substituted. A word from the reference was substituted with an aligned word from the hypothesis.
Also unlike the Levenshtein distance, the WER counts the deletions, insertion and substitutions done, instead of just summing up the penalties. To do that, we'll have to first create the table for the Levenshtein distance algorithm, and then backtrace in it through the shortest route to [0,0], counting the operations on the way.
Then, we'll use the formula to calculate the WER:
From this, the code is self explanatory:
The distance function is based on the Levenshtein Distance (for finding the edit distance between words). The WER, like the Levenshtein distance, defines the distance by the amount of minimum operations that has to been done for getting from the reference to the hypothesis. Unlike the Levenshtein distance, however, the operations are on words and not on individual characters. The possible operations are:
Deletion: A word was deleted. A word was deleted from the reference.
Insertion: A word was added. An aligned word from the hypothesis was added.
Substitution: A word was substituted. A word from the reference was substituted with an aligned word from the hypothesis.
Also unlike the Levenshtein distance, the WER counts the deletions, insertion and substitutions done, instead of just summing up the penalties. To do that, we'll have to first create the table for the Levenshtein distance algorithm, and then backtrace in it through the shortest route to [0,0], counting the operations on the way.
Then, we'll use the formula to calculate the WER:
From this, the code is self explanatory:
def wer(ref, hyp ,debug=False): r = ref.split() h = hyp.split() #costs will holds the costs, like in the Levenshtein distance algorithm costs = [[0 for inner in range(len(h)+1)] for outer in range(len(r)+1)] # backtrace will hold the operations we've done. # so we could later backtrace, like the WER algorithm requires us to. backtrace = [[0 for inner in range(len(h)+1)] for outer in range(len(r)+1)] OP_OK = 0 OP_SUB = 1 OP_INS = 2 OP_DEL = 3 # First column represents the case where we achieve zero # hypothesis words by deleting all reference words. for i in range(1, len(r)+1): costs[i][0] = DEL_PENALTY*i backtrace[i][0] = OP_DEL # First row represents the case where we achieve the hypothesis # by inserting all hypothesis words into a zero-length reference. for j in range(1, len(h) + 1): costs[0][j] = INS_PENALTY * j backtrace[0][j] = OP_INS # computation for i in range(1, len(r)+1): for j in range(1, len(h)+1): if r[i-1] == h[j-1]: costs[i][j] = costs[i-1][j-1] backtrace[i][j] = OP_OK else: substitutionCost = costs[i-1][j-1] + SUB_PENALTY # penalty is always 1 insertionCost = costs[i][j-1] + INS_PENALTY # penalty is always 1 deletionCost = costs[i-1][j] + DEL_PENALTY # penalty is always 1 costs[i][j] = min(substitutionCost, insertionCost, deletionCost) if costs[i][j] == substitutionCost: backtrace[i][j] = OP_SUB elif costs[i][j] == insertionCost: backtrace[i][j] = OP_INS else: backtrace[i][j] = OP_DEL # back trace though the best route: i = len(r) j = len(h) numSub = 0 numDel = 0 numIns = 0 numCor = 0 if debug: print("OP\tREF\tHYP") lines = [] while i > 0 or j > 0: if backtrace[i][j] == OP_OK: numCor += 1 i-=1 j-=1 if debug: lines.append("OK\t" + r[i]+"\t"+h[j]) elif backtrace[i][j] == OP_SUB: numSub +=1 i-=1 j-=1 if debug: lines.append("SUB\t" + r[i]+"\t"+h[j]) elif backtrace[i][j] == OP_INS: numIns += 1 j-=1 if debug: lines.append("INS\t" + "****" + "\t" + h[j]) elif backtrace[i][j] == OP_DEL: numDel += 1 i-=1 if debug: lines.append("DEL\t" + r[i]+"\t"+"****") if debug: lines = reversed(lines) for line in lines: print(line) print("#cor " + str(numCor)) print("#sub " + str(numSub)) print("#del " + str(numDel)) print("#ins " + str(numIns)) return (numSub + numDel + numIns) / (float) (len(r)) wer_result = round( (numSub + numDel + numIns) / (float) (len(r)), 3) return {'WER':wer_result, 'Cor':numCor, 'Sub':numSub, 'Ins':numIns, 'Del':numDel}The code is based on the Java implementation of the algorithm by romanows.